Australian Maritime Safety Authority’s declines to renew contract for maintenance of navigation aids
LATEST
Australia’s maritime sector will soon be at greater risk of cyber-attack, affecting trade, defence and shipping safety – with added risk of major environmental damage on the Great Barrier Reef.
This is the view of industry sources puzzled by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority’s refusal to renew the contract for the maintenance of navigation aids in Australia.
That contract was awarded to AMS Group when the work was first privatised in 2001 and held ever since, until now. It expires in June next year. AMS Group was the only tenderer.
Presumably, the other parties who initially expressed interest realised they did not have the capacity to do the highly specialised work.
“AMSA’s approach to market did not identify a suitable contractor and AMSA is pursuing an alternative strategy to continue maintenance of the Aids to Navigation network," AMSA said.
This is despite AMS Group successfully running the navigation network for the past 22 years and won numerous awards.
AMSA did not say what its new strategy is or how far advanced it is.
Industry and government sources are very concerned because with only seven months left, there is not enough time to get an alternative system running – especially the replacement of AMS Group’s very effective cyber protection.
Hackers have already targeted Australian ports. Earlier this month, DP Ports had to shut ports on the eastern seaboard because of a cyber-attack. About 30,000 containers were stranded for several days.
Industry sources say that AMS Group is concerned that without a contract renewal or a developed alternative, its 53 highly specialised staff will start looking for work elsewhere and the skill-set will be lost to Australia. In most other countries the navigation aids are run by government agencies, such as the US Coast Guard.
An industry source said that, before refusing to renew the contract, AMSA should have developed any alternative strategy first and satisfied itself that it would be safer than existing arrangements.
Industry sources say that what is happening is needlessly exposing the entire Australian marine navigation system and the Great Barrier Reef environment to major operational and security risks.
About 18,000 vessels a year pass through the international shipping lane between the reef and the coastline. It parts it is as narrow as five nautical miles. In those circumstances the maintenance of the navigation aids – bouys, radar stations, lighthouses and the like – is critical. As is its protection from cyBer-attack.
The unrenewed contract also includes the maintenance of Australia’s tsunami-warning system.
This article was submitted to the offices of the Minister for Defence; the Minister for Cyber Security and the Minister for Infrastructure for comment, but no replies were received before publication.
Thank you!
Newsport thanks its advertising partners for their support in the delivery of daily community news to the Douglas Shire. Public interest journalism is a fundamental part of every community.
Got a news tip? Let us know! Send your news tips or submit a letter to the editor here.
* Comments are the opinions of readers and do not represent the views of Newsport, its staff or affiliates. Reader comments on Newsport are moderated before publication to promote valuable, civil, and healthy community debate. Visit our comment guidelines if your comment has not been approved for publication.